Site Selection
Region, community, site, and space are separate questions with separate evidence. Location decisions go wrong when the four get collapsed into one — usually by whatever space happened to be available that month.
Ask a practice owner why they chose their location and you will usually hear about the space. The rent, the layout, the landlord, how it felt on a Tuesday afternoon walk-through. You rarely hear about the region, and almost never in that order.
Our team has closed more than 230 transactions since 2015, and 60 of them were relocations. A location decision is not permanent. But unwinding one costs considerably more than the difference most owners are trying to protect when they make it.
What follows is the order these decisions belong in, and the evidence that belongs to each one. We call the sequence The Four Decisions of Practice Location.
The Sequence
Each of these narrows the next. Taken in order, the search gets smaller and the evidence gets more specific. Taken out of order — which is what happens when a listing shows up first — every decision above it quietly gets made for you.
Commute, family, hospital privileges, where you already have relationships, and any non-compete radius carried over from a current employer. These are constraints, not preferences, and they set the outer boundary of the search before any data is pulled. A non-compete in particular can remove the exact submarket a demographic study would recommend.
This is the data decision — households, age structure, income, growth, existing provider supply, and honest drive times. It is also the decision most often skipped, because it is the only one you cannot evaluate by standing in a room.
Zoning, parking ratios, access, utilities, signage, and municipal review. A site can sit in the right community, on the right road, and still be unable to become a clinic on any schedule you would accept.
Square footage and layout, ceiling height and structure, the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing capacity the practice requires — and then rent, allowance, term, and delivery. This is the decision most owners start with, and it belongs last — not because it matters least, but because it is the only one you can still negotiate after the other three are settled. Opening or expanding is where the sequence pays for itself.
The Community Decision
Southeast Michigan is not a market you can grow along with. SEMCOG’s regional forecast projects roughly 7% population growth across the region over thirty years, with natural growth turning negative after 2043 — more deaths than births. Regional tailwind is not part of the plan here.
That changes what to look for. In a fast-growing metro, the useful question is where the rooftops are going. Here, the useful questions are about composition and supply: which age cohorts a community is gaining or losing, how households are forming, how many providers in your discipline already serve the area, and how far patients realistically travel to reach them.
Most of the baseline is free. SEMCOG publishes community-level population, household, and employment profiles for every municipality in the region, and they are a better starting point than a broker’s summary of the same numbers.
Two habits are worth adopting early. Read drive time, not radius — a five-mile circle drawn across I-696, a rail crossing, or a river is not a five-mile market, and the difference shows up in January. And separate market growth from market share: a flat community with thin provider coverage can be a far better home for a practice than a growing one that is already well served.
What the data cannot tell you is whether it is describing your practice. A pediatric dental practice reads a census tract by the households with children in it. An endodontic practice barely reads it at all. Two owners can study the same community, both correctly, and reach opposite conclusions.
Specialty Differences
A general practice draws from households. A referral-driven specialty draws from the offices that refer to it, and those offices sit wherever they sit. The relevant geography is not the trade area around the site — it is the set of referring practices within a distance those referrals will actually travel.
Orthodontics, endodontics, oral surgery, and pediatric dental together account for roughly a quarter of the practices our team has represented since 2015. For that group, the site work starts by mapping referral sources and asking a different question: not how many people live here, but how many referring offices find this convenient, and who else is already convenient to them.
The practical consequence is that the same building can be an obvious yes and an obvious no, depending on which practice is asking. It is also why a location recommendation that arrives without a question about your referral pattern is not a recommendation about your practice.
The Site Decision
Two spaces in the same community, at similar rents, can be a straightforward clinical build and an eighteen-month municipal project. Almost none of that difference is visible on a tour. It lives in the ordinance, the utility service, and the recorded documents — which is why the site review belongs before the letter of intent, not after.
What we check before a site is worth an offer:
Zoning district, and whether a clinical use is permitted by right or only by special land use
The parking ratio the ordinance requires for a medical use, and whether the site can physically meet it
Curb cuts, turn restrictions, and how a patient actually enters from the road
The signage the ordinance permits — not the signage described on the tour, and less of a factor than most owners assume
Water, sewer, gas, and electrical service already at the site, and what upgrading them costs
Structure, ceiling height, and floor loading where imaging or heavy equipment is planned
Barrier-free access and the full path of travel from the parking space to the treatment room
Recorded restrictions, exclusives, and co-tenancy language that can limit or bar a clinical use
Whether any planned service or equipment falls under Michigan’s Certificate of Need program
Timing is the part that surprises people. A planning commission may meet once a month. A special land use approval, a variance, or a site plan revision can add several of those meetings to a schedule that already has equipment lead times in it. The question is not only whether a municipality will say yes — it is when, and whether your opening date survives the answer.
The Evaluation
Criteria come before candidates. Written down, the four decisions turn into an evaluation any property can be held against — and most of the value is in the second column. Anyone can list what makes a property attractive; the discipline is knowing what removes one from consideration, because a disqualifier discovered after the letter of intent is signed costs real money and real months.
| Decision | What Skylark evaluates | What can disqualify a candidate |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Licensure and hospital privileges, commute and family geography, existing relationships, any non-compete radius carried from a current employer. | A non-compete that removes the recommended submarket; a commute the owner will not sustain for a decade. |
| Community | Households and age structure, income, growth, existing provider supply, referral patterns, staffing geography, honest drive times. | Provider coverage the practice cannot differentiate against; a patient base the real drive times never reach. |
| Site | Zoning and permitted clinical use, the required parking ratio, access and curb cuts, signage rights, utility service, recorded restrictions and co-tenancy language. | A use permitted only by special approval on a timeline the opening date cannot survive; parking the ordinance requires but the site cannot hold; a recorded exclusive that bars the use. |
| Space | Square footage and layout fit, ceiling height and structure, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing capacity, build-out cost against allowance, all-in occupancy cost, lease or ownership economics. | A floor plan that fights the clinical layout; an infrastructure upgrade whose cost erases the deal; economics that only work if nothing goes over budget. |
No property clears every row cleanly. The point is to know which compromises are being made, name them, and price them — before anyone falls for a space.
The Common Trap
Here is how the sequence usually breaks. The community that fits the practice has nothing available. Something good is available two communities over. Nobody decides to change the plan — the plan simply follows the inventory, and six months later the location decision has been made by a leasing calendar.
Sometimes moving on is right. What matters is that it is a decision, made with the trade-off visible, rather than a default. When the community is worth holding, there is more to work with than what is listed: owners who are not marketing but would transact, leases coming up in buildings that never post availability, users preparing to vacate, second-generation clinical space, and land where a build-to-suit is realistic.
That work takes time, which is the argument for starting the location conversation earlier than feels necessary — well before a space needs to be found. It is also why a shorter term nearby is sometimes the right move: it keeps the practice open and the better site reachable. A relocation done deliberately, on your schedule, is a very different transaction from one done under a lease expiration.
The Comparison
When the search produces two or three real candidates, the natural move is to line them up side by side. That comparison quietly rewards the wrong things — the fresher finishes, the better staging, the more agreeable landlord — because those are the differences a walk-through can see. The differences that decide the next fifteen years mostly cannot be seen on a tour.
The better discipline is to hold each candidate against the evaluation above, one at a time, and let the disqualifiers do their work first. What survives gets compared on evidence: the community each site actually reaches, what each site permits and when, what each build genuinely costs, and the all-in occupancy economics once every quote is normalized to the same terms — because two rents with different structures cannot be compared as printed.
Run that way, the comparison often ends somewhere unexpected: the candidate that showed worst on the tour wins on the evidence, or none survives and the search continues. Both are better outcomes than choosing the property that presented best.
Where This Fits
For a first practice, this decision sits alongside financing and timing, and the sequencing matters as much as the answer — that is the subject of our guide to starting a practice. A lease renewal is the same decision in disguise: staying is a choice to re-select the location, and it deserves the same evidence the original choice should have had. A building purchase raises the stakes, because ownership makes the location much harder to reverse.
Discipline changes the analysis too — the dental version of this question is not the veterinary or the primary care version. And geography is its own body of knowledge: how the corridors of Metro Detroit actually behave is where the community decision gets specific — and in a market like Washtenaw County, so does the lease-or-own answer.
In order: region, then community, then site, then space. Settle what your life and credentials allow, find the community that can support the practice, confirm what a specific site permits, and only then negotiate the deal. Each decision narrows the next, and most location mistakes come from running the sequence backward — starting with whatever space happened to be available.
Treat it as evidence, not a verdict. The data can tell you how a community is composed, how it is changing, and how many providers already serve it. It cannot tell you whether it is describing your practice, and it cannot see street-level conditions — access, visibility, how patients actually move. When the spreadsheet and the street disagree, go look at the street.
Earlier than feels necessary — we generally recommend 12–18 months before a target opening or lease expiration. Clinical space is usually built or adapted rather than found move-in ready, municipal approvals run on public-meeting calendars, and the off-market work that opens up a held community takes time that a compressed schedule does not have.
Then decide — deliberately — whether to wait, work the community off-market, or change the plan with the trade-off priced. Owners who are not marketing but would transact, leases quietly coming due, and land where a build-to-suit is realistic are all real paths. What a practice should not do is let the leasing calendar make the decision by default.
Start Before the Search
The earlier this conversation starts, the more of the map is still open to you.
Start a Conversation