Site Selection

Choosing a Location Is Four Decisions, Not One.

Region, community, site, and space are separate questions with separate evidence. Location decisions go wrong when the four get collapsed into one — usually by whatever space happened to be available that month.

Ask a practice owner why they chose their location and you will usually hear about the space. The rent, the layout, the landlord, how it felt on a Tuesday afternoon walk-through. You rarely hear about the region, and almost never in that order.

Our team has closed more than 230 transactions since 2015, and 60 of them were relocations. A location decision is not permanent. But unwinding one costs considerably more than the difference most owners are trying to protect when they make it.

What follows is the order these decisions belong in, and the evidence that belongs to each one.

The Sequence

Four decisions, in order.

Each of these narrows the next. Taken in order, the search gets smaller and the evidence gets more specific. Taken out of order — which is what happens when a listing shows up first — every decision above it quietly gets made for you.

Region: what your life and your credentials allow.

Commute, family, hospital privileges, where you already have relationships, and any non-compete radius carried over from a current employer. These are constraints, not preferences, and they set the outer boundary of the search before any data is pulled. A non-compete in particular can remove the exact submarket a demographic study would recommend.

Community: where the practice can be supported.

This is the data decision — households, age structure, income, growth, existing provider supply, and honest drive times. It is also the decision most often skipped, because it is the only one you cannot evaluate by standing in a room.

Site: what a specific corner actually permits.

Zoning, parking ratios, access, utilities, signage, and municipal review. A site can sit in the right community, on the right road, and still be unable to become a clinic on any schedule you would accept.

Space: the deal itself.

Rent, allowance, term, delivery. This is the decision most owners start with, and it belongs last — not because it matters least, but because it is the only one you can still negotiate after the other three are settled. Opening or expanding is where the sequence pays for itself.

The Community Decision

What the demographic data can tell you — and what it can’t.

Southeast Michigan is not a market you can grow along with. SEMCOG’s regional forecast projects roughly 7% population growth across the region over thirty years, with natural growth turning negative after 2043 — more deaths than births. Regional tailwind is not part of the plan here.

That changes what to look for. In a fast-growing metro, the useful question is where the rooftops are going. Here, the useful questions are about composition and supply: which age cohorts a community is gaining or losing, how households are forming, how many providers in your discipline already serve the area, and how far patients realistically travel to reach them.

Most of the baseline is free. SEMCOG publishes community-level population, household, and employment profiles for every municipality in the region, and they are a better starting point than a broker’s summary of the same numbers.

Two habits are worth adopting early. Read drive time, not radius — a five-mile circle drawn across I-696, a rail crossing, or a river is not a five-mile market, and the difference shows up in January. And separate market growth from market share: a flat community with thin provider coverage can be a far better home for a practice than a growing one that is already well served.

What the data cannot tell you is whether it is describing your practice. A pediatric dental practice reads a census tract by the households with children in it. An endodontic practice barely reads it at all. Two owners can study the same community, both correctly, and reach opposite conclusions.

Specialty Differences

For referral-driven practices, the map is drawn by other offices.

A general practice draws from households. A referral-driven specialty draws from the offices that refer to it, and those offices sit wherever they sit. The relevant geography is not the trade area around the site — it is the set of referring practices within a distance those referrals will actually travel.

Orthodontics, endodontics, oral surgery, and pediatric dental together account for roughly a quarter of the practices our team has represented since 2015. For that group, the site work starts by mapping referral sources and asking a different question: not how many people live here, but how many referring offices find this convenient, and who else is already convenient to them.

The practical consequence is that the same building can be an obvious yes and an obvious no, depending on which practice is asking. It is also why a location recommendation that arrives without a question about your referral pattern is not a recommendation about your practice.

The Site Decision

The site decides what the building is allowed to become.

Two spaces in the same community, at similar rents, can be a straightforward clinical build and an eighteen-month municipal project. Almost none of that difference is visible on a tour. It lives in the ordinance, the utility service, and the recorded documents — which is why the site review belongs before the letter of intent, not after.

What we check before a site is worth an offer:

Zoning district, and whether a clinical use is permitted by right or only by special land use

The parking ratio the ordinance requires for a medical use, and whether the site can physically meet it

Curb cuts, turn restrictions, and how a patient actually enters from the road

The signage the ordinance permits — not the signage described on the tour

Water, sewer, gas, and electrical service already at the site, and what upgrading them costs

Structure, ceiling height, and floor loading where imaging or heavy equipment is planned

Barrier-free access and the full path of travel from the parking space to the treatment room

Recorded restrictions, exclusives, and co-tenancy language that can limit or bar a clinical use

Whether any planned service or equipment falls under Michigan’s Certificate of Need program

Timing is the part that surprises people. A planning commission may meet once a month. A special land use approval, a variance, or a site plan revision can add several of those meetings to a schedule that already has equipment lead times in it. The question is not only whether a municipality will say yes — it is when, and whether your opening date survives the answer.

The Common Trap

Availability is not a location strategy.

Here is how the sequence usually breaks. The community that fits the practice has nothing available. Something good is available two communities over. Nobody decides to change the plan — the plan simply follows the inventory, and six months later the location decision has been made by a leasing calendar.

Sometimes moving on is right. What matters is that it is a decision, made with the trade-off visible, rather than a default. When the community is worth holding, there is more to work with than what is listed: owners who are not marketing but would transact, leases coming up in buildings that never post availability, users preparing to vacate, second-generation clinical space, and land where a build-to-suit is realistic.

That work takes time, which is the argument for starting the location conversation earlier than feels necessary — well before a space needs to be found. It is also why a shorter term nearby is sometimes the right move: it keeps the practice open and the better site reachable. A relocation done deliberately, on your schedule, is a very different transaction from one done under a lease expiration.

Where This Fits

The location question shows up more than once.

For a first practice, this decision sits alongside financing and timing, and the sequencing matters as much as the answer — that is the subject of our guide to starting a practice. A lease renewal is the same decision in disguise: staying is a choice to re-select the location, and it deserves the same evidence the original choice should have had. A building purchase raises the stakes, because ownership makes the location much harder to reverse.

Discipline changes the analysis too — the dental version of this question is not the veterinary or the primary care version. And geography is its own body of knowledge: how the corridors of Metro Detroit actually behave is where the community decision gets specific.

Market perspective by Noah Bradley, Founder & Principal Broker, Skylark Commercial Realty.

Sources & market data: SEMCOG — 2050 Regional Forecast · SEMCOG — Community Profiles · MDHHS — Certificate of Need. Data accessed August 2026. Transaction history: Skylark closed-deal records, 2015–2026.

Start Before the Search

Still deciding where the practice should go?

The earlier this conversation starts, the more of the map is still open to you.

Start a Conversation